I personally don't own a Sherwood system (..yet) but I assume the addresses must be similar (RSX address -1 ).
Will be interesting to see how later systems react to the CELL undervolting, though this is huge for Phats because this will prevent senseless kills by failed delids (ask me how I know).
As i promised i threw an eye on my slim and i found the Cell VID address. it is in fact 0x50.
First i took a look at the stock value, i expected it to be FF. and thats what i found.
so i played around with some values, first i decided to feed it a low value
i let it run for about 15 minutes until the temps reach its maximum and wont raise any further (fixed it at 76% fanspeed cause im doin overvolting later)
it plateaud at 37C CPU. as a proof of concept i chosed a ridiciously low voltage next to see if it crashes and throw some errors, especially cell errors. and that was the case. i put in a value something around 0.7v and tried to boot.
aaaaaand yep. it freezed on bootscreen and on top it ylods. that could be useful data, so leets see whats in the errlog:
say hello there, we got some Cell attention and livelock errors. ignore the 3 bottom errors, they are not recent as u can obviously see from the timestamp.
so next i wanted to validate. i took a high value, could be something like 1,25v.
we are able to boot again and ive let it sit for 15 minutes again... and yep, we got significantly higher temps on cell (of course it affects RSX a little due to dissipational reasons).
so i can a 100% confirm that 0x50 is Cell VID and 0x51 is RSX VID on slim consoles. VID Tables are in fact the same for both chips
@RIP-Felix