KAMAL 4.70 v1.00 CFW

K

Kamal

Member
KAMAL 4.70 v1.00 CFW

CFW Features of 4.70 KAMAL v1.00:
1. MADE OUT OF 4.70 OFW
2. HAVE INSTALL PACKAGE FILES AND APP_HOME
3. HAVE REACTPSN COMPATIBILITY
4. PATCHED LV0 TO DISABLE ECDSA CHECKS
5. PATCHED LV2 TO ADD PEEK/POKE SUPPORT
6. PATCHED LV1 TO DISABLE LV2 PROTECTION
7. PATCHED LV1 TO ADD PEEK/ POKE SUPPORT
8. CAN BE UPDATED OVER ANY CFW.
9. CAN BE UPDATED OVER 3.55 OFW
10. RSOD BYPASS
11. REACTPSN OFFLINE PATCH ADDED
12. BETTER SYSTEM STABILITY

TESTED
CECH2101A NOR-SLIM
CECHK01 NOR-FAT
CECHC04 NAND-FAT




USE IT ON YOUR OWN RISK
DOWNLOAD KAMAL_4.70

MD5: D0E9F51B7C743BAB060C9A2D70F1D689
 
Last edited:
[MENTION=1571]Kamal[/MENTION] , this is your first CFW correct?

The models tested was just a NOR Model (NAND CONSOLEs BEWARE)? At very least a NOR & NAND should be tested.
 
STLcardsWS said:
[MENTION=1571]Kamal[/MENTION] , this is your first CFW correct?

The models tested was just a NOR Model (NAND CONSOLEs BEWARE)? At very least a NOR & NAND should be tested.
Click to expand...
Hi [MENTION=2]STLcardsWS[/MENTION]
No this is not my first cfw i have created 4.66 but never made public
 
Kamal said:
Hi [MENTION=2]STLcardsWS[/MENTION]
No this is not my first cfw i have created 4.66 but never made public
Click to expand...

Well we always just go by whats public because that is all we can base anything off of.

In my opinion i do not think this CFW was tested enough to determine the safety on enough models. As i did see the other thread over at tortuga-cove, asking for testers as you did not have a flasher yourself and i only see Carlos as a tested model . So it appears you did not even test your own model. more then one model needs to be tested before a release..
 
STLcardsWS said:
Well we always just go by whats public because that is all we can base anything off of.

In my opinion i do not think this CFW was tested enough to determine the safety on enough models. As i did see the other thread over at tortuga-cove, asking for testers as you did not have a flasher yourself and i only see Carlos as a tested model . So it appears you did not even test your own model. more then one model needs to be tested before a release..
Click to expand...
i have nor ps3 its the same
 
And NAND PS3? ^^

I have tested CCAPI over console than this CFW yet it's "just" a homebrew^^. I recommende to you to test your CFW on more PS3 model, if people brick their PS3 with this CFW, they will come here and accuse the forum for this release.

But thank you for this release and your job
 
Me and my friend have nor consoles. If someone with nand have progskeet test it i will be thankfull.
 
Kamal said:
Tested
cech2101a nor-slim
cechk01 nor-fat
cechc04 nand-fat
Click to expand...

Good to see more test:

I hope you learned from it and that was the goal of yours, but for various reasons this will not make it to the news.

1.) The feature list is just a cut copy and paste of what appears to be one of habib builds. (that raises some flags)
1. MADE OUT OF 4.70 OFW
2. HAVE INSTALL PACKAGE FILES AND APP_HOME
3. HAVE REACTPSN COMPATIBILITY
4. PATCHED LV0 TO DISABLE ECDSA CHECKS
5. PATCHED LV2 TO ADD PEEK/POKE SUPPORT
6. PATCHED LV1 TO DISABLE LV2 PROTECTION
7. PATCHED LV1 TO ADD PEEK/ POKE SUPPORT
8. CAN BE UPDATED OVER ANY CFW.
9. CAN BE UPDATED OVER 3.55 OFW
10. RSOD BYPASS
11. REACTPSN OFFLINE PATCH ADDED
12. BETTER SYSTEM STABILITY
Click to expand...

2.) Nothing new is brought to the table here. No disrespect but i would advise user;s to use a CFW from someone that has an established history.

This is good for a learning experience and i hope that is what you are trying to do is learn and not using MFW builder like others have on the past to slap on a new name and call it a new CFW . Sadly we see that often within the communities and it does no good for anyone but add confusion and even problems.
 
STLcardsWS said:
Good to see more test:

I hope you learned from it and that was the goal of yours, but for various reasons this will not make it to the news.

1.) The feature list is just a cut copy and paste of what appears to be one of habib builds. (that raises some flags)


2.) Nothing new is brought to the table here. No disrespect but i would advise user;s to use a CFW from someone that has an established history.

This is good for a learning experience and i hope that is what you are trying to do is learn and not using MFW builder like others have on the past to slap on a new name and call it a new CFW . Sadly we see that often within the communities and it does no good for anyone but add confusion and even problems.
Click to expand...

it has this feature
i didnt use mfw builder i used scetool and puad gui to make this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Back
Top