Hi, I recently got my hands on a few PS4 Pro CUH-7216B in pristine condition running out of the box firmware 6.51 with everything else still sealed in original packaging (the consoles have been powered on to check firmware only). I was already the owner of two PS4 Pro (CUH-7016B and CUH-7216B) running the 9.00 exploit. I do find the 9.00 exploit very stable although the USB insertion is a bit annoying (yes I'm aware you can buy a jig to act as a USB emulator to do this for you).
So I would like to ask the question... should I stay on 6.72? (in 2023). The reason why I am saying in 2023 is because I believe the 7.02 and 7.55 exploits use different kernel exploits compared to 6.72, so in my head I am thinking in theory the 6.72 exploit chain will have been made more stable since? And I know the general consensus is 5.05 > 9.00 > 6.72 > 7.xx . Any figures of % for 6.72 success rate, how less stable/successful is it than 9.00.
I also know the 9.00 update includes the CMOS bomb fix, but IIRC GoldHEN now reinstates that for FW lower than 9.00. The only real thing I would be missing out on is HDR? And of course having to backport.
Thoughts?
So I would like to ask the question... should I stay on 6.72? (in 2023). The reason why I am saying in 2023 is because I believe the 7.02 and 7.55 exploits use different kernel exploits compared to 6.72, so in my head I am thinking in theory the 6.72 exploit chain will have been made more stable since? And I know the general consensus is 5.05 > 9.00 > 6.72 > 7.xx . Any figures of % for 6.72 success rate, how less stable/successful is it than 9.00.
I also know the 9.00 update includes the CMOS bomb fix, but IIRC GoldHEN now reinstates that for FW lower than 9.00. The only real thing I would be missing out on is HDR? And of course having to backport.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
