DualBoot CFW 4.88

D

Demask70

Member
Hi,

I was wondering if Senior Member Littlebalup is going to release the new version of his CFW "DualBoot" based on OFW 4.88.

If anyone has any news, I'll bee grateful!

Thanks,

F
 
It's fairly safe making DB HFW, all I do is extract the dev_flash from the normal DB CFW PUP with PUAD, Then replace the webkit with the one from 4.82, then repack.

Here is one I prepared earlier. Only tested on a CECH2103B

DOWNLOAD

MD5: 6626784C2456582BF5AAFA1439FA03DF

Thanks to @littlebalup for the original DB PUP I used as a base.
 
DeViL303 said:
It's fairly safe making DB HFW, all I do is extract the dev_flash from the normal DB CFW PUP with PUAD, Then replace the webkit with the one from 4.82, then repack.

Here is one I prepared earlier. Only tested on a CECH2103B

DOWNLOAD

MD5: 6626784C2456582BF5AAFA1439FA03DF

Thanks to @littlebalup for the original DB PUP I used as a base.
Click to expand...
thanks, i am trying making one now when i saw this. if i do it correctly, should md5 of mine match yours?
 
Coro said:
i was just wondering about that because i am using the 2.0 beta. i will try with 1.5 because i see they do not match.
Click to expand...
You probably know this but make sure you are replacing the silk_webkit.sprx, not the silk_wk.sprx.

The 4.82 one is 5.72MB - 5860KB - 5,999,635 bytes
 
DeViL303 said:
You probably know this but make sure you are replacing the silk_webkit.sprx, not the silk_wk.sprx.

The 4.82 one is 5.72MB - 5860KB - 5,999,635 bytes
Click to expand...
the md5 using 1.5 version is still different...i wonder if this is just due to encryption? anyways, thanks again the pup. i will dive back into this if i ever get that flasher.
 
Coro said:
the md5 using 1.5 version is still different...i wonder if this is just due to encryption? anyways, thanks again the pup. i will dive back into this if i ever get that flasher.
Click to expand...
Not sure, I thought it would have been the same, but maybe there is some random element to repacking a PUP, or its down to different timestamps on the files or something. Not sure.
 
DeViL303 said:
Not sure, I thought it would have been the same, but maybe there is some random element to repacking a PUP, or its down to different timestamps on the files or something. Not sure.
Click to expand...
are you using 64-bit or 32-bit version of 1.5 gui?
 
64bit afaik, not sure but its not installed in the x86 Program Files folder so I assume its 64bit.
 
DeViL303 said:
64bit afaik, not sure but its not installed in the x86 Program Files folder so I assume its 64bit.
Click to expand...
i made 2 with 32bit on a different PC, their md5's do not match each other or the one i made with 64-bit or the one you made. surely i am not messing up something different everytime so it could just be the way it is...
 
DeViL303 said:
It's fairly safe making DB HFW, all I do is extract the dev_flash from the normal DB CFW PUP with PUAD, Then replace the webkit with the one from 4.82, then repack.

Here is one I prepared earlier. Only tested on a CECH2103B

DOWNLOAD

MD5: 6626784C2456582BF5AAFA1439FA03DF

Thanks to @littlebalup for the original DB PUP I used as a base.
Click to expand...
I just tested on CECHL-01 and CECH-2001A both were able to install HEN and go back to CFW! Thanks :)
 
With DB CFW You don't need HEN to go back to normal CFW. That's the reason of DB CFW, otherwise we would install just OFW . :P
 
DeViL303 said:
This is DB HFW though, the whole point is it allows HEN to install while still allowing CFW to install after. It's useful for testing HEN.
Click to expand...
for consoles 3.55
can I install this HFW DB to test the HEN and then can I go back to CFW?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Back
Top