Tanzu15
Member
I'd honestly wait till he tests it and verified it's 100% safe.It's just drag the .jp file over the .bat file right?
Then what?
Should a message come up?
or doe we have to change .jp to .pup once dragged?
I'd honestly wait till he tests it and verified it's 100% safe.It's just drag the .jp file over the .bat file right?
Then what?
Should a message come up?
or doe we have to change .jp to .pup once dragged?
And even if the higher RSX speed only causes spontaneous crashes, it's still enough to mess with the firmware update (since you have to go through the XMB or Recovery mode) which then will also require a hardware flasher.unfortunately, only with flasher you can revive bad coreos
Well damn. Ok so is there a way to up the voltage to gain stability?And even if the higher RSX speed only causes spontaneous crashes, it's still enough to mess with the firmware update (since you have to go through the XMB or Recovery mode) which then will also require a hardware flasher.
The 650 MHz core clock has been tested on devkits with use the best binned chips and it's not stable, that's why for the initial tests lv1 was loaded over the network, never written to the ros.
so you say even the minimal setup for installation can break?And even if the higher RSX speed only causes spontaneous crashes, it's still enough to mess with the firmware update (since you have to go through the XMB or Recovery mode) which then will also require a hardware flasher.
The 650 MHz core clock has been tested on devkits with use the best binned chips and it's not stable, that's why for the initial tests lv1 was loaded over the network, never written to the ros.
And even if the higher RSX speed only causes spontaneous crashes, it's still enough to mess with the firmware update (since you have to go through the XMB or Recovery mode) which then will also require a hardware flasher.
The 650 MHz core clock has been tested on devkits with use the best binned chips and it's not stable, that's why for the initial tests lv1 was loaded over the network, never written to the ros.
Wait, this was only tested on 90nm? Cause I have a slim, which is much better and should have much better head room. Also they don't answer if we can up the voltage to gain stability. Cause I know for a fact the normal overclock doesn't touch voltage in the slightest.While that's probably true, I would assume that was on 90nm RSXs and not the 65nm or the 40nm which could have different results.
Yes, it can even crash before you can execute a lv2diag since lv2 already calls the rsx init.so you say even the minimal setup for installation can break?
But Sony has no handling for different clocks in lv1. There's also no support for platform specific PUPs. Which means people could install it on their console with 90nm RSX.While that's probably true, I would assume that was on 90nm RSXs and not the 65nm or the 40nm which could have different results.
Syscon loads the voltage setting from the RSX fuses and then sets it. You can change that behaviour on the DECR-1000. Idk about other platforms.Also they don't answer if we can up the voltage to gain stability. Cause I know for a fact the normal overclock doesn't touch voltage in the slightest.
Ok. So there's a way to increase voltage to stabilizing overclocks? Cause a fully cleaned and repasted slim and even the later fats have so much thermal heat room for over clocking. There has to be ways to stabilize overclocks. This is important since this would help sooooo many games keep 60 FPS or actually stay at 30. The normal OC we have now does wonders for soooo many games accross the board. But there's still a bit more we need to actually have the ideal PS3 experience.Yes, it can even crash before you can execute a lv2diag since lv2 already calls the rsx init.
But Sony has no handling for different clocks in lv1. There's also no support for platform specific PUPs. Which means people could install it on their console with 90nm RSX.
Syscon loads the voltage setting from the RSX fuses and then sets it. You can change that behaviour on the DECR-1000. Idk about other platforms.
Yes, it can even crash before you can execute a lv2diag since lv2 already calls the rsx init.
But Sony has no handling for different clocks in lv1. There's also no support for platform specific PUPs. Which means people could install it on their console with 90nm RSX.
Syscon loads the voltage setting from the RSX fuses and then sets it. You can change that behaviour on the DECR-1000. Idk about other platforms.
I wouldn't do that if I were you. I want them to to also do some voltage increases for stability.Ok, if someone patches a 650mhz and sends it to me, i have a Slim i can sacrifice for the experiment.
They get a good boost. But we would need a bit more OC to get the perfect FPS on many Many games. I wish I knew how to mod this myself, but I lack the knowledge.How is the framerate in uncharted, metal gear solid 5, deus ex: human revolution?
They get a good boost. But we would need a bit more OC to get the perfect FPS on many Many games. I wish I knew how to mod this myself, but I lack the knowledge.
You'd most likely also need a CPU overclock to fix this. Many early games are horribly CPU limitedThey get a good boost. But we would need a bit more OC to get the perfect FPS on many Many games. I wish I knew how to mod this myself, but I lack the knowledge.
It isn't enough. I've tested over 50 games. It's a great OC but not perfect. I feel another 100mhz would do wonders. But we need more voltage like any pc. My PS3s have plenty head room.The 600mhz OC i more than enough bud. Load it and enjoy your games. when you need more FPS, junp on the PS4 or PS5.
Cpu overclock is possible, but the guys that do these OCs say it's only on the fat models. I'm ok with just gpu OC. Since a lot of games are gpu limited.You'd most likely also need a CPU overclock to fix this. Many early games are horribly CPU limited