what's the point? how does this help anywhere?
AFAIK it will lead to real QA flag on 4.xx firmwares
that sounds like a possibility to OFW to OFW downgrade .. correct me if I'm wrong.
it does not want to get into my mind, how exactly (please describe method) could this help? you cannot calculate and it is bound to DEX
on the other hand, the case looks different and interesting![]()
it shouldn't interfere at all. just because it's dex doesn't mean we can't use dex cfw from that. the issue is only the minver. the ideal would be finding a 3000 qa token with 3.60 min ver so we could use qaf options on firmwares between 3.60 and 4.20yay, jackpot (....bound to 4.21), thanks
does the target do not interfere? I mean, token is bound to target/idps (already have checked this and improoved qa flagging myself), how could this help with retail?
ok, I see. if possible, you want to go (the infamous) DEX route on Superslims. fine for me, but probably problem for regular users.it shouldn't interfere at all. just because it's dex doesn't mean we can't use dex cfw from that. the issue is only the minver. the ideal would be finding a 3000 qa token with 3.60 min ver so we could use qaf options on firmwares between 3.60 and 4.20