** ** www.ps3xploit.net > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com) > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com hosting renewal is every 3 years, due in October 2022.
Donations triggered by this thread seem to have benefited **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new) mainly for the time being.
IMHO That's normal that most of the donations go to **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new)
1- Both domains use the
same name with different top-level domain. This caused a severe confusion even to me.
2- People tend to relate
.com to any domain. Therefore **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new) is and will be more popular than ** ** www.ps3xploit.net > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com) > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com
3-
** ** www.ps3xploit.net > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com) > Domain no Longer owned by team** (NEW URL = http://ps3toolset.com is a link inside **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new). So many visitors may think that it is a
sub-service of **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new)
4- CFW has existed for more than a decade. So most of the CFW-compatible console owners already have CFW or are not interested in CFW.
Only a small amount segment needs bgtoolset.
5- bgtoolset is mainly a "
one-time tool". As result it's a use it and forget it.
6- **ps3xploit.com >Domain no Longer owned by team** (ps3xploit.me =new) is the opposite of points 4 and 5: most slims 3xx and super slims need it and people need to visit the site regularly for install, enable HEN or even to use bgtoolset.
7- bgtoolset is a
FREE tool. People tend to sub valuate free things.
8- As it's free to use, some people may think that it is a COPYLEFT tool, which is not the case.
9- bgtoolset doesn't even mention what kind of license it has (apart of a few recent posts where you clearly express that you're against dumps).
Until this moment it was unclear that the issue is the lack of support from the community. From twitter/this thread, it looked like the issue was originally the Russian cloners or maybe the unofficial dumper that served as base for the copycats.
Honestly I feel you're giving an ambiguous message: is it a private project or a public one?
As I commented privately, take your time and decide what to do with the future of this fantastic project.