There's HFW 4.91.1 and HEN 3.3.0, which are based on the latest fw and will work.It work on last fw too ?
There's HFW 4.91.1 and HEN 3.3.0, which are based on the latest fw and will work.It work on last fw too ?
Yes i know but i ask about the flash writer on 4.91...There's HFW 4.91.1 and HEN 3.3.0, which are based on the latest fw and will work.
That's still under development, but bgtoolset for 4.91 is already available so there's no need to wait, until you really can't connect your PS3 to the Internet for some reason.Yes i know but i ask about the flash writer on 4.91...
I use the flash writer all time because it's offline...That's still under development, but bgtoolset for 4.91 is already available so there's no need to wait, until you really can't connect your PS3 to the Internet for some reason.
Well, at this point the community treats Flash Writer mainly as a backup tool in case something happens to bgtoolset, which is considered vastly superior except for not being available offline. It will be ported eventually but devs are not in a rush.I use the flash writer all time because it's offline...
Yes thanks but need it for new console...Well, at this point the community treats Flash Writer mainly as a backup tool in case something happens to bgtoolset, which is considered vastly superior except for not being available offline. It will be ported eventually but devs are not in a rush.
Also note that you only need an updated version if you have a console already on 4.91, otherwise you can just install HFW 4.90, use the current tool and then flash Evilnat 4.91 without having to go through 4.90 CFW. Also if your console is already on CFW you can just update without hacking again.
Well then, unfortunately you'll have to either use bgtoolset or wait until an updated Flash Writer is released. Either way you end up with the same result.Yes thanks but need it for new console...
Well then, unfortunately you'll have to either use bgtoolset or wait until an updated Flash Writer is released. Either way you end up with the same result.
P.S.
Avoid using Flash Writer and always opt for bgtoolset if you have a NAND console (CECHA through CECHG). Flash Writer is unable to backup the entire NAND and therefore a botched flash might turn your console into a paperweight.
The most probable is that you have reason, but i will never trust on any online tool. Not with this kind of operations. So let's see if we finally get ported the flashwriter for the 4.91...
I think it might be a "not using Windows because I can't see its source code to verify it doesn't have NSA backdoors" sort of thing.BgToolset is way more trustworthy and safer than FlashWriter. And there is no argue with that.
I think it might be a "not using Windows because I can't see its source code to verify it doesn't have NSA backdoors" sort of thing.
I used the wrong account on my mobile device LOL I'll swap back to my main, but yeCould be. But, why doubt when the developer is here on the forums, and is a trustworthy member of the scene?.
But to each their own. If people want to use the more dangerous FlashWriter, please let them have it.
Agreeable, If I had the required tools to remove my superslim motherboard I'd be able to revert back to 4.89 from my old dumps of it. Figured I mention but being able to participate in the testing phase for a 4.60 minver superslim.I understand the fundamentals behind that reasoning about closed source etc.. and it's not entirely wrong in theory, yet I can't help but laugh.
In practice, who among all users is even able to analyse a payload released with old offline tools (that I wrote also btw) and even among those few individuals who are able, who actually does it????
The fact that a tool is offline is no guarantee that it is safe and vice versa online..
members are allowed only one account. i understand you were locked out, but you are back in control of it now.I used the wrong account on my mobile device LOL I'll swap back to my main, but ye
But everyone knows you're a secret agent working for the NSA and your closed source tool has backdoors that convert people's PS3s into drones in a huge botnet that hacks into the air force PS3 supercluster that is secretly still running in area 51.I understand the fundamentals behind that reasoning about closed source etc.. and it's not entirely wrong in theory, yet I can't help but laugh.
In practice, who among all users is even able to fully analyse a payload released with old offline tools (that I wrote also btw) and even among those few individuals who are able, who actually does it????
I wonder how many people have actually reviewed the entire official HEN build code available on GitHub to ensure it was 'safe'?
What about CFW patches? Has anyone ever checked that Nat's or Rebug CFWs for instance are 'safe'?
The fact that a tool is offline is no guarantee that it is "safe" and vice versa online..